Dylan: Kina censurerede ikke
2 CommentsSiden Bob Dylan gav koncerter 6. april i Beijing og 8. april i Shanghai har diskussionen – også her på bloggen – gået om, hvorvidt hans repertoire ved komcerterne var blevet underlagt forhåndscensur af de kinesiske myndigheder. Og New York Times-klummeskriveren Maureen Dowd beskyldte Dylan for at sælge ud på en hidtil uset måde og “for bare at spille sin censurerede sætliste, tage sin stak af kommunistkontanter og skride…”
Diskussionen har nu affødt noget så sjældent som en direkte henvendelse fra Bob Dylan til hans fans. På sin hjemmeside har han lagt et brev ud, som lyder som følger:
To my fans and followers,
Allow me to clarify a couple of things about this so-called China controversy which has been going on for over a year. First of all, we were never denied permission to play in China. This was all drummed up by a Chinese promoter who was trying to get me to come there after playing Japan and Korea. My guess is that the guy printed up tickets and made promises to certain groups without any agreements being made. We had no intention of playing China at that time, and when it didn’t happen most likely the promoter had to save face by issuing statements that the Chinese Ministry had refused permission for me to play there to get himself off the hook. If anybody had bothered to check with the Chinese authorities, it would have been clear that the Chinese authorities were unaware of the whole thing.
We did go there this year under a different promoter. According to Mojo magazine the concerts were attended mostly by ex-pats and there were a lot of empty seats. Not true. If anybody wants to check with any of the concert-goers they will see that it was mostly Chinese young people that came. Very few ex-pats if any. The ex-pats were mostly in Hong Kong not Beijing. Out of 13,000 seats we sold about 12,000 of them, and the rest of the tickets were given away to orphanages. The Chinese press did tout me as a sixties icon, however, and posted my picture all over the place with Joan Baez, Che Guevara, Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg. The concert attendees probably wouldn’t have known about any of those people. Regardless, they responded enthusiastically to the songs on my last 4 or 5 records. Ask anyone who was there. They were young and my feeling was that they wouldn’t have known my early songs anyway.
As far as censorship goes, the Chinese government had asked for the names of the songs that I would be playing. There’s no logical answer to that, so we sent them the set lists from the previous 3 months. If there were any songs, verses or lines censored, nobody ever told me about it and we played all the songs that we intended to play.
Everybody knows by now that there’s a gazillion books on me either out or coming out in the near future. So I’m encouraging anybody who’s ever met me, heard me or even seen me, to get in on the action and scribble their own book. You never know, somebody might have a great book in them.
Som Rolling Stone skriver: Det næste bliver vel, at han opdager Twitter…
About the author
2 Comments
Anmeldelser

Charles Bradley bløder stadig
No CommentDa Charles Bradley for to år siden i en alder af 62 albumdebuterede med No time for dreaming lød han ikke som en debutant. Hans bluesmættede soulfunk lød både gammel og ny. Han havde været helt nede og var kommet op ved at bruge musikken som stige. Det var ikke sådan, at man ikke kunne […]
Journalistik og musik

Utroligt, men sandt: Sven Gaul bliver 60
No CommentFor mange er Steffen Brandt så afgørende for TV-2, at de sætter lighedstegn mellem ham og poporkestret, men folk omkring bandet er ikke i tvivl: Det er trommeslageren Sven Gaul, der er bandets kapelmester og cheflogistiker. Sådan har det været siden det såkaldt progressive band, Taurus, sagde farvel til 70’erne og mødte 80’erne som TV-2, […]
Det sjoveste er næsten, at alverdens journalister kan blive ved med en løbende anklage mod Dylan for at ‘sælge ud’.
Der må vel være en rimelig grænse for, hvor mange gange dette kan være tilfældet før nogen opdager, at man måske har misforstået noget…
Hvis Dylan skulle have ‘solgt ud’ alle de gange i løbet af de sidste 50 år, som det er blevet påstået, så skulle han alene være ansvarlig for amerikansk økonomis sammenbrud :-).
Hele Kina-kontroversen ville aldrig have kørt så lang tid hvis man huskede på to ting:
1) Dylan har ikke tidligere vist tilbøjlighed til at lade sig diktere af andre eller i øvrigt gøre sig umage for at indfri ‘folks’ forventninger.
2) Han har løbende nægtet at være forpligtet til at forsvare sine handlinger/musik/tekster overfor verden i almindelighed.
Ergo må en følelse af at han ‘sælger ud’ altid være rodfæstet i den enkelte og ikke Dylan.
Så bliver man skuffet over noget i Dylans oevre, så skulle man hellere gribe muligheden for at granske grundlaget for ens egne forventninger/behov/opfattelser end at (endnu en gang) påstå, at Dylan har ‘solgt ud’.
Man må gerne være uenig med Dylan og mene at albums/koncerter/udtalelser er forfærdelige.
Men det har egentlig ikke noget med Dylan at gøre